ACER

Europe – October 22, 2026 -- ACER's Board of Appeal will begin a new five-year mandate on 18 October 2026 with two new members and four first-time alternates, refreshing the body that reviews complaints against the agency's decisions.

Administrative Board appoints panel after Commission call for interest

ACER's Administrative Board made the appointments, following a proposal by the European Commission and in consultation with ACER's Board of Regulators. The process followed a public call for interest that the Commission launched earlier this year.

Batlle and De Hauteclocque join four continuing members

Mr Carlos Batlle and Mr Adrien De Hauteclocque have been elected as new members. They join Mr Piet Eeckhout, Mr Miro Prek, Ms Keelin O'Brien and Ms Katerina Sardi, who will continue to serve.

SHERIDAN, WYOMING - March 31, 2026 - Energy traders, compliance teams and market surveillance leaders in Europe face a more direct enforcement environment in 2026 as ACER sets the procedural framework for cross-border REMIT investigations and advances new reporting guidance under the revised regime. The 43rd edition of ACER's REMIT Quarterly centers on new Rules of Procedure for cross-border investigations, a practical step after EU legislators updated the REMIT framework in 2024 and gave ACER additional tasks, including the power to investigate cross-border cases. The quarterly also outlines ACER's stakeholder engagement plan for 2026, ongoing preparatory work on data reporting pending finalisation of the revised REMIT Implementing Regulation, and market surveillance updates tied to wholesale energy market integrity across the EU.

SHERIDAN, WYOMING - March 31, 2026 - Danish gas tariff decisions in 2026 face a more demanding transparency test, with direct implications for how shippers, storage users and regulators evaluate network charges tied to upstream infrastructure. ACER's latest report reviews Energinet's proposed reference price methodology under the EU Network Code on Harmonised Transmission Tariff Structures and finds that while several core design elements align with the rules, the cost treatment of the upstream Baltic Pipe section cannot yet be fully assessed because key detail is missing.