
SHERIDAN, WYOMING – May 5, 2025 – In a dental landscape increasingly dominated by minimally invasive approaches, orthognathic surgery—supported by pre- and post-surgical orthodontics—is regaining prominence as a critical solution for addressing complex skeletal deformities that fall beyond the scope of traditional orthodontics.
This resurgent interest is not merely cosmetic. When aesthetic, functional, and long-term stability outcomes are considered, orthognathic surgery emerges as a high-ROI treatment path for select cases. It effectively bridges orthodontic limitations by offering predictable, stable results where skeletal discrepancies compromise both occlusion and facial harmony.
Orthognathic Surgery: A Modern Answer to Structural Challenges
Far from obsolete, orthognathic procedures now reflect over six decades of refinement. The roots of modern orthognathic surgery trace back to the 1957 introduction of the Obwegeser sagittal osteotomy, enabling precise mandibular repositioning. By the 1970s, LeFort's osteotomic studies further advanced maxillary surgery, allowing three-dimensional skeletal corrections.
Today’s procedures enable:
- Mandibular retraction or advancement with condylar control
- Maxillary elevation and autorotation to address open bite and hyperdivergence
- Transverse expansion via surgical segmentation and rapid palatal expanders
Such capabilities position orthognathic surgery as a strategic tool for treating skeletal Class III malocclusions, severe asymmetries, and other structural anomalies.
Pre-Surgical Orthodontics: A Distinct Clinical Pathway
One of the critical distinctions in this treatment model is between traditional and pre-surgical orthodontics. While the former often relies on dental camouflage, pre-surgical orthodontics is purpose-built to prepare the arches for surgical mobilization. This divergence is more than technical—it’s foundational.
Key orthodontic objectives prior to surgery include:
- Full resolution of crowding within each arch independently
- Decompensation of occlusal patterns to reveal true skeletal disharmony
- Managing the curve of Spee and transverse discrepancies
Rather than pursuing cosmetic perfection before surgery, clinicians focus on skeletal readiness. As the source material notes, “the incisors are the true anteroposterior positional guide for the surgeon,” making precise orthodontic alignment essential for optimal surgical outcomes.
When Orthognathic Surgery Becomes the Treatment of Choice
For patients with conditions that orthodontics alone cannot address, orthognathic surgery offers decisive benefits:
- Aesthetics: Avoids poor facial profiles that may result from non-surgical dental realignment.
- Function: Resolves bite issues rooted in skeletal asymmetries, such as unilateral crossbites.
- Stability: Delivers long-term correction in scenarios where orthodontic treatment alone is likely to relapse.
- Treatment Efficiency: Often shortens total treatment duration in cases requiring significant skeletal adjustment.
These benefits are particularly relevant in adult patients, where growth modification is no longer an option, and structural realignment is the only viable solution.
Surgical Planning and Post-Treatment Protocols
Once orthodontic goals are achieved, comprehensive records are collected—including impressions, study casts, orthopantomography, and lateral teleradiography—to guide the surgical planning process.
In cases of asymmetry, a posteroanterior skull X-ray aids in determining osteotomic lines and skeletal repositioning. After surgery, patients typically undergo 6–8 weeks of functional recovery, followed by a brief 4–6 month post-surgical orthodontic phase to refine aesthetics and final occlusion.
Strategic Outlook for Dental and Orthodontic Practices
For dental professionals and orthodontists, embracing orthognathic surgery as a clinical tool reflects a broader shift toward interdisciplinary treatment planning and higher-value patient outcomes. This approach is not about reverting to invasive models, but rather about leveraging surgical precision when skeletal challenges make it necessary.
To remain competitive and patient-centric in the B2B dental sector, clinics must offer this integrated pathway—combining functional correction, aesthetic enhancement, and long-term stability.