CMMC Pause Raises False Claims Act Risk for Defense Contractors

Image
CMMC Pause Raises False Claims Act Risk for Defense Contractors

United States – October 28, 2026 -- The Pentagon's suspension of CMMC Phase II third-party assessment requirements has made contractors' own self-attestations the main compliance record, raising their exposure under the False Claims Act (FCA). Mandatory C3PAO certifications remain on hold following the Department of War's class deviation, but Phase I self-attestation is still fully active.

Phase I obligations and prime contractor requirements remain in force

Contractors must still self-attest compliance with NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 wherever DFARS 252.204-7012 applies. The 110 controls in that standard remain the legal baseline for any organization that processes or stores controlled unclassified information (CUI).

Prime contractors can also require CMMC Level 2 C3PAO assessments through supply chain clauses, independent of the Department of War's action. Suppliers must meet flow-down requirements and submit Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) scores, or risk losing contracts.

Self-reported SPRS scores now carry greater FCA liability

With no third-party check behind a submission, internal representations entered into federal databases carry more legal weight. The Department of Justice does not distinguish between a false third-party certification and a false self-attestation. Even unintentional misreporting can expose contractors to FCA enforcement, whistleblower suits and contract forfeiture.

Experts urge three steps: Rev 3 parameters, mock assessments, audit trails

Speakers at the webinar "Beyond the Pause: How Defense Contractors Can Master CMMC Readiness" recommended that contractors:

  • Begin incorporating the organization-defined parameters introduced in NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into their Rev 2 implementation, tailoring controls to operational technology and information security needs.
  • Run a mock assessment. It costs less than a third-party assessment because it avoids certification costs such as eMASS submission, and prime contractors increasingly accept mock assessment documentation in place of formal third-party audits.
  • Build an audit-ready trail by documenting assessment methodology, continuously validating operational evidence and verifying that written policies match day-to-day operations.
Cloud tools handling CUI must meet FedRAMP Moderate/Class C

Under DFARS 252.204-7012, cloud platforms that store or process CUI, including governance, risk and compliance (GRC) software, must meet FedRAMP Moderate/Class C standards. Hyperproof Gov runs on FedRAMP Certified Class C (Rev5) infrastructure. It offers automated SPRS scoring based on real-time control health, System Security Plan management, and continuous evidence mapping across multiple frameworks to avoid duplicate evidence collection.

The webinar featured experts from Aprio, Choice Cyber Solutions and Hyperproof.

Published by:
fairsonline_team
Industries
Products
News Type